When you have the temerity to disagree with the emotional, fact-less screeds of leftist Democrats, you put yourself in line for some harsh name-calling.
If you don’t believe the Earth is turning into a smoldering cinder due to carbon fuel consumption, why then you are a climate denier. Yes, the label makes no sense. One does not deny there is a climate simply because one does not believe we as Earthlings are ruining it.
This denier tag got its first wide usage regarding the morons who would argue there never was a Jewish Holocaust.
Interesting how the leftists have turned around the use of the word “denier” from being critical of those ignoring the facts, to being critical of those who cite facts.
This brings us to the subject of election deniers. The term is used with disdain by leftists and left-leaning media alike to describe any Republicans who did not see the 2020 presidential election as legitimate.
These people witnessed videos of suitcases full of ballots being pulled from under tables and run through machines after the workers allegedly had gone home for the night, as had observers. They expressed concern about it all.
Satisfactory explanations never were provided.
In other Democratic strongholds, windows were taped over to prevent observers from monitoring the ballot count, or Republican observers simply were forced to leave, physically.
Dead voters remained on rolls and the bastardization of the mail-in voting process was rampant, almost always in leftist states, or those whose election oversight fell under the control of leftists. That would be so-called swing states such as my Pennsylvania, which had some curious results from Philadelphia.
Statistical analysis showed that while Clueless Joe Biden getting all the votes he needed without any late-night and mail-in abuses was possible, it was about as likely as someone being struck by lightning – twice.
Legitimate questions were raised and never satisfactorily addressed, despite evidence that the electronic voting machines could and were, in some instances, accessed remotely, something manufacturers swore couldn’t happen.
All these alleged abuses are impossible, said the leftist Democrats, arguing in the face of the facts. Should you disagree with them, you are simply a denier.
Ironically, it is Democrats who have elevated election denial to an artform. Remember Al Gore refusing to accept his 2000 loss?
How about Hillary and her characterization of Donald Trump as an illegitimate winner?
Kari Lake, an outspoken Republican running for governor in Arizona, brought up election-denier whining by Democrats earlier this week, using a data package given to her by a constituent to note plenty of this in the past.
Among examples Lake mentioned was the continuing denials by Stacey Abrams when she lost the last Georgia governor’s race. She’d better get the denials shined up because she’s losing again, if polls are to be believed.
On the subject of polls, the realclearpolitics.com web site is chock full of polls. Despite the appearance of these, with many races leaning Democrat, the site not only is predicting the Republicans take control of the U.S. House, it also predicts a final 52-48 edge for Republicans in the Senate.
This is due to realclearpolitics adjusting polls with a four-percent or so fudge factor shown in the past to exist in polls systemically under-representing conservative and/or Republican sentiment.
If these predictions come to fruition, brace for a wave of losing Democrats claiming election misconduct.
They will not be deniers, of course, just concerned guardians of our democracy.
Sam Ross Jr's site 