Behold, the electric vehicle, the answer to all our energy problems, or so you would believe by listening to the ramblings of energy illiterates ranging from Clueless Joe Biden on down.
When the facts don’t support them, these unrepentant blowhards just massage those facts.
Clueless Joe’s equally clueless Transportation Secretary Pete Butt(whatever) was at his statistical misdirection best when testifying before the House of Representatives. Secretary Pete was asked about suggesting people upset with high gasoline prices just switch to electric vehicles and if he stood by those remarks.
Not surprisingly, he did, despite it being noted that the average electric vehicle costs more than its traditional internal combustion engine counterpart.
Secretary Pete responded by citing some MSRPs for electric vehicles, including $26,595 for a Chevrolet Bolt and $39,974 for a Ford F-150 Lightning. Just today, July 22, and too late for inclusion on Pete’s list, Cadillac announced a new electric car, the Celestiq, slated to cost $300,000 OR MORE, when it debuts next year.
Let’s start with the Bolt, the hatchback econobox of electric vehicles, which according to reviewers has all the cheap feel you would expect from that term.
Add in that similar cars with conventional engines cost many thousands less.
There also is the unpleasant fact that Bolt production was halted for eight months last year and early this due to a recall to fix batteries in 2017-22 models that posed a fire risk.
So, the Bolt might be relatively affordable among electric cars, if you can find one, or want one considering their checkered reputation.
As for the Ford pickup, the electric version of America’s top-selling truck for 46 years, two important points on that $39,974 starting price.
First, according to the Ford web site, you can’t order one due to demand. Second, the vehicle shown on the company’s web page has a list price of $67,474, an upcharge of more than $27,000 from the base.
At a recent car show I chatted with an acquaintance who has had occasion to drive one of these electric Ford trucks ( a fleet delivery to a government organization) and he said acceleration was impressive. This, coming from a guy who has a 1967 Chevelle 396 as a hobby car, was a good endorsement.
But then he moved on to cost and scarceness. Suffice it to say, he’s not rushing out to buy one of the trucks.
Electric vehicles are pitched as saving owners massively on fuel costs. That depends in large part on where one lives and the varying costs of electricity. And the fact that the government offers tax rebates in order to lure in purchasers speaks to some degree of manipulating economic reality.
There was a cautionary tale on Yahoo and various other web sites in recent days about the experience of a Florida teenager buying a used 2014 Ford Focus electric vehicle.
Her parents paid $11,000 for the car, which had about 60,000 miles on it when purchased, and she drove it without incident for about six months. But now the car isn’t working and she’s been told it needs a new battery.
The father had passed away with cancer since the purchase, so the grandfather offered to help financially.
That would-be benefactor and the entire family were stunned to find it would cost $14,000, plus labor for a new battery. But no problem with the high cost, the batteries no longer are available because Ford stopped manufacturing the car.
Even when things are “working” J.D. Power reports electric vehicles average 39 percent more problems when the vehicles are new than what owners of conventional new vehicles suffer.
To sum up, the electric vehicles cost more initially, and have more problems, but you save a few bucks on gas!
Other problems with electric vehicles, in no particular order, are:
Here in the north, their advertised ranges decrease dramatically in cold weather. Our Florida girl’s battery pack likely would have failed years ago in colder climes.
Even rapid charging takes half an hour or more, much longer than the few minutes it takes to pump gasoline. Charging at home could take all night.
Our national electric grid, already creaking and threatening to fail during periods of high demand, cannot possibly handle the increased load if everyone drove electric cars and recharged them at night.
Electric vehicles might be a viable option if you never want to venture far from home. But if you do, good luck finding charging stations when you need them. The Wall Street Journal recently reported the horror story of a staff writer encountering major recharge problems with an electric car on a trip from New Orleans to Chicago and back. The writer also shared anecdotal negative feedback from other electric car travelers during lengthy waits for their vehicles to be filled up with voltage.
You’d think environmentalist wacko types would be concerned about the carnage inflicted on the Earth from mining for the minerals needed for batteries, the damage when all those used up batteries are dumped into landfills, or the pollution from the burning of the fossil fuels that more than likely will power the recharging of that electric vehicle.
But still GM and Ford, among others, rush headlong to convert their production to electric vehicles, chasing the fool’s gold of government monetary incentives and political approval.
If people really want to save the environment, try walking, riding a bicycle or a motorcycle.
Consider switching to compact cars instead of 7-passenger SUVs or pickup trucks the size of semis, both often driven by lone 100-pound women, wearing COVID-protection masks in the isolation of their massive vehicles.
This sort of person never will buy a Bolt, but might spend $70,000 on the truck. Just think of all the gas savings!