This is Veteran’s Day and vets such as my late father and three deceased uncles would be horrified at what has transpired in this nation, whose way of life they fought to preserve.
The uncles served in World War II, in the European and Pacific theaters, and fortunately all returned to live out their lives as civilians. My father fought in Korea and came home unscathed.
Too many others were not as lucky.
Imagine their surprise, were they alive, to see massive voting irregularities that are being swept under the rug by the allegedly victorious Biden campaign, not to mention the media types who serve as the Democratic party’s public relations organs.
The New York Times, with its revamped slogan of “All the News That Fits Our Agenda, We Print,” came out yesterday with a headline that proclaimed “No Evidence of Voter Fraud.” Of course, they backed that off in the body of the story, downgrading to no evidence of massive fraud that changed the outcome.
Yet tonight’s Tucker Carlson show on Fox ran a lengthy list of names of deceased people who had voted in this election. This is evidence of election fraud and unless the New York Times can prove Carlson wrong, then a retraction of the headline is in order.
This is an old tabloid journalism trick, that the Times once was above, that being to write an incendiary headline that the story doesn’t support. Generic example: “Does chewing gum cause cancer? See Page 7” Then you turn to Page 7 and find no, it doesn’t.
As for meaningful evidence of election-changing fraud, in some of these states with extremely close vote totals it really wouldn’t take many dead voters state-wide to make a difference.
And that doesn’t even address the apparent rampant bastardization of the mail-in votes. I want to know who legitimately won this election, not whose organization could best manipulate the vote by altering counts or submitting hordes of invalid votes.
To repeat, is it mere coincidence that Republican poll watchers were banned from doing their jobs, most notably in Philadelphia? Is it mere coincidence that this was done in a Liberal stronghold, but our Left-leaning Lamestreet Media sees no problem?
Reverse the roles, have Democratic poll watchers barred and get ready to see the outrage shouted from the highest hills by these very same media types who see no problem here.
This is what bothers Trump supporters, this inconsistent application of standards and rules. Trump and his supporters are held to a ridiculously strict standard. Leftists can commit murder and their supporters will scream police brutality should they be arrested.
Defenders of the Blue Crew will maintain that the Republicans have no more than circumstantial evidence of widespread voter fraud. But mostly circumstantial evidence was enough to convict Timothy McVeigh for murder and conspiracy.
Circumstantial evidence was similarly the preponderance of the evidence that convicted Scott Peterson in the murder of his pregnant wife in a very high-profile case.
Circumstantial evidence certainly should be considered and weighed heavily in the matter of the integrity of the election for president of this nation.
Georgia has announced that it will look at its election results in-depth, but will this be the sort of meaningful audit that ferrets out fraud, or merely one that makes sure the ballots – valid or not – were counted correctly?
I want to know if reports of massive irregularities in mail-in voting, things like signatures not matching, ballots not being signed at all, ballots arriving late or not in the proper outer envelope, will be checked.
Obviously it is much easier for a dead person to vote by mail than in-person, perhaps a factor in the push by Democrats for more and more mail-in votes.
I want to know if the Philadelphia votes that were run through without a poll watcher present for the Republicans will be refactored.
I want a check to see if allegations of manipulation of electronic vote totals due to software glitches, or more nefarious reasons, are accurate.
At worst, this should be viewed as a warning and a call for preparation to avoid similar shenanigans in the two Georgia runoff elections for U.S. Senate that have the potential to deadlock the Senate and give President Harris – as part of her VP duties – the deciding vote in a tie.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, sire of the portly actress of the same surname, already is salivating at removing “minority” from his title.
“Now we take Georgia then we change America,” he screamed at a recent event.
Notice he didn’t say win the elections in Georgia. Too many Democrats like to take things, particularly elections.
Sam Ross Jr's site 